Comment from: John Pederson [Visitor] Email · http://www.ijohnpederson.com
I saw Andy a few years back...wish I would have blogged my notes on it. I remember very little of it other than it was an incredible experience.

I think our next key step is to be able to mash the messages of the "best of breed" curriculum & assessment speakers with our messages. I've spent a good amount of time deconstructing Willard Daggett's "rigor, relevance, relationships" stuff recently.

Thanks for sharing tonight!
October/18/07 @ 22:22
Comment from: Kyle Lichtenwald [Visitor] Email · http://www.lightinthewoods.edublogs.org
Thanks for this post. I know educators that attended this presentation and now I can participate in discussion with them and am able to ask better questions to stimulate thought and discussion.
October/20/07 @ 10:33
Comment from: cpbw [Visitor] Email · http://cpbwsk.edublogs.org
I was part of the STF Forum on accountability and stayed for the keynote of the Assessment Conference. Dr. Hargreaves was the speaker for both events.

The presentations had similarities, however, each presentation had valuable information that was only included in one and not the other.

Driving home, I spent much time considering his piece on trust and betrayal within accountability, his suggestion to adopt a mentality of responsibility as opposed to accountability and the climate of fear in institutions such as schools.

I have read quite a few John Abbott articles (www.21learn.org) and had recently been at a Dr. Lee Jenkins presentation. I had several questions I wanted to ask Dr. Hargreaves. He was kind enough to give me 20 minutes of his time to answer five questions. What a great discussion!

Within his presentation, I felt, the Powerpoint wavered from being useful tool. There were long periods of time where I had a choice of a bad view of the speaker or a slide that had been up for several minutes depicting an old advertisement for rubber galoshes.

Dr. Hargreaves and John Abbott both consider a viable European school and community model where students have higher success rates then our own. My question is: If this is what we want for ourselves, how are we going to stop the current social trends (working more and less family and community-time or complete exclusion there-from) and the worsening social climate in our local communities, to begin to build a much more inclusive model? This model would have to integrate schools, families and communities to be successful. Are Saskatchewan's School Community Councils a first step in this direction?

During Dr. Hargreaves keynote the focus was the future and improvement, however emerging technologies and their impact were not considered. It seemed to me as if we were discussing improving and meeting our emerging needs all within the context of a traditional educational system, ignoring the fact that our schools and the practice of education are changing. I did like his thought about embracing our past to then chart our future but what if our past knows nothing of our future? Am I wrong to have this impression?
October/27/07 @ 12:06

This post has 1 feedback awaiting moderation...

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
« Joanne Quinn...Unleashing the PotentialWho will you vote for? »