Comment from: Tim Eirich [Visitor] Email
Education on how to access and use technology appropriately is really what is required at home and at school. What one parent or school division may block children access to another may not have blocked and therefore education is the key.

Do parents block their children from going outside knowing that there is the possibility that their child could get hit by a car, bit by a stray dog, or meet up with a stranger? No they do not. Parents do believe and understand the importance of teaching their children to look both ways before crossing the street, what to do when they encounter an unfriendly dog and what to do when they meet up with strangers. They understand that it is critical for their children to learn the "do's" and "don't's" of the real world because they are preparing their children to live and work in the real world and technology is a part of the real world and therefore should not be treated differently.




April/18/08 @ 00:45
Comment from: Tracey Lagasse [Visitor]
Yet another parent does not seem to see her daughter's teachers as what they (we) are - professionals. We are not going to let kids run amok on social networking sites, but to ban them completely? We've tried that. Not only do the smart ones figure out how to get around the blocking, but it does nothing to communicate how we can use social networking in a positive way. But it's another way for parents to put the onus on us, rather than supervising their children themselves at home.

But I agree with Dean - it has more to do with adults (the parent and the reporter both) who fail to understand the technologies available, which then means they don't know how to turn their use into something positive.
May/20/08 @ 10:30
Comment from: Ian Chipman [Visitor]
Social networking sites of a non-pseudonymous nature (effectively, PERSONALS sites) are for adults and were originally intended only for them. Threats of online sexual predators are real, although rare. With fewer kids on those sites (can't kick them all out, but then again, digital rights management doesn't eliminate piracy 100%), there will be less predators trolling for them.

It's sad that the social networking industry and its proponents (some of which seem to be astroturfers) are being rebellious about this. Why can't they self-regulate and join parents, telling kids why they SHOULDN'T be on those sites?

Is it really that hard for kids to learn how to socialize offline? If a kid has trouble socializing offline, shouldn't the kid be reformed to be more sociable?

And why should parents NOT have the right to keep their kids off of social networking sites, and explain to them why they shouldn't use them? Don't parents have the right to censor TV shows and games? Don't they have the right to guide their kids in their religious choices? Why shouldn't it be the same with Web sites?
July/19/08 @ 23:19
Comment from: admin [Member] Email
Ian,

You should read or listen to Danah Boyd who explains quite articulately why kids are involved with social networks. Ironically one of those reasons is that parents have been so concerned with physically safety and monitoring that kids are less able to "hang out" with friends like we once did. There are other reasons as well, based on research and findings but rest assured, it's not going away so we'd better figure out how to handle it.
July/20/08 @ 16:58

This post has 1 feedback awaiting moderation...

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
« What Education can learn from Las VegasTesting Windows Live Writer »